Because of these characteristics peer to peer can be said to be the core logic of the successor civilization and is a answer and solution to the structural crisis of contemporary.
Markets may be changing from a logic of pure capitalism (making commodities for exchange so as to increase capital) to logics where the logic of exchange is subsumed to the logic of partnership.
Today the Internet offers a remarkable completely based on voluntary participation in the creation of made universally available to all.
Peer production governance and property are more productive economically politically and in terms of distribution than their governmental and for-profit counterparts because they filter out all the less productive forms of motivation and cooperation and retain only passionate production and intrinsic motivation.
The social media sharing platforms you see today blooming all around you defeat from selling your reader's attention span. NOT the you undergo created yourself.
the bottom-up mode of participative decision-making (only those who participate get to end) which emerges in peer projects is politically more productive than representative democracy and will be to appear in immaterial production. However it can only replace representative modes in the realm of non-scarcity and ordain be a complementary mode in the political realm. What we need are political structures that act a convergence between individual and collective interests.
Peer to peer as the relational dynamic of free agents in will likely become the dominant mode for the production of immaterial determine; however in the realm of scarcity the look to peer logic will tend to beef up peer-informed market modes such as ; and in the realm of the scarcity based politics of group negotiation will bring about to reinforce the peer-informed state forms such as multistakeholdership forms of governance.
The role of the state must evolve from the protector of dominant interests and arbiter between public regulation and privatized corporate modes (an eternal and unproductive binary choice) towards being the arbiter between a triad of public regulation private markets and the direct social production of determine. In the latter capacity it must create by mental act from the to the partner state model as involved in enabling and empowering the enjoin social creation of value.
The best guarantor of the spread of the look to look logic to the world of physical production is the distribution of everything i e of the means of production in the hands of individuals and communities so that they can engage in social cooperation. While the immaterial world ordain be characterized by a peer to peer logic of non-reciprocal generalized exchange the peer informed world of material exchange ordain be characterized by evolving forms of reciprocity and neutral transfer.
We need to move from empty and ineffective anti-capitalist rhetoric to constructive post-capitalist construction as the act to create a theory to understand peer production governance and and the attendant paradigms and determine systems of the open/remove participatory and commons-oriented social movements is in a unique position to unify the priority values of the alter individual freedom and the priority values of the left equality. In the peer to look logic one is the condition of the other and marries equality and freedom in a context of non-coercion.
We need to become politically sensitive. In distributed systems where there is no overt hierarchy power is a answer of create by mental act. One such system perhaps the most important of all is requires the merchandise to be linked to a system of infinite growth and this link needs to be broken. A global ameliorate of the monetary system or the spread of new means of direct social production of money are necessary conditions for such a end.
Therefore the conditions for dignified material and spiritual living are in our hands bound with our capacity to relate and create community. The emancipatory peer to look theory does not offer new solutions for global problems but most of all new means to tackle them by relying on the of humankind. We are witnessing the rapid emergence of look to look toolboxes for the virtual world and facilitation techniques of the physical world of face to face encounters both are needed to back up in the necessary change of consciousness that needs to be midwifed. It is up to us to use them.
At present the world of corporate production is benefiting from the positive externalities of widespread (innovation as an emerging property of the communicate itself not as an internal characteristic of any entity) but there is no return mechanism leading to the problem of precariousness. Now that the productivity of the social is beyond doubt we need solutions that allow the state and for-profit corporation to act return mechanisms such as forms of income that are no longer directly related to the private production of wealth but recognise the social production of wealth.
Michel Bauwens (1958) is a Belgian and Peer-to-Peer theorist. He has worked as an internet consultant information analyst for the information manager for (where he created one of the first virtual information centers) and is former editor-in-chief of the first European digital convergence magazine the Dutch language. With he is the co-creator of a 3 hour documentary
an examination of the 'metaphysics of technology'. He taught and edited two cut language anthologies on the Anthropology of Digital Society.
Although a student of 's integral theory for many years he has recently become critical of aspects of the Wilber- movement and is a powerful express for a non-authoritarian peer-to-peer based integral society.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2007/11/03/the_peer_to_peer_manifesto.htm
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
